Skip to content

Justice For All

2009 November 17

As you’ve most certainly heard by now, the DOJ announced last week that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (KSM) will be tried in federal criminal court rather than a military tribunal. The specific court that will be the venue for KSM’s prosecution is located in lower manhattan, just a few blocks from the site of the terrorist attacks KSM is accused of masterminding.

I, for one, think this is a good thing. First of all, the attacks were 8 years ago now and it is about time that justice is served. Secondly, I think that a prosecution in a U.S. criminal court is, in fact, serving justice. How many times in the last 8 years have we heard the word “justice” thrown around, particularly by our government leaders, as what we stand for, the reason we are at war, the reason we will not tolerate x, y or z, the reason liberals/conservatives are wrong on issues a, b, or c. It’s all about justice for those who lost their lives that day. Justice for all, as we like to say.

As a lawyer, I have had occasion to think about the pros and cons of our justice system many times, personally and professionally. Perhaps blinded by the tens of thousands of dollars I invested in obtaining a law degree and license to practice law,  I actually believe we have a damn good justice system. Yes, sometimes it fails. But the core of our system is the American citizen – the juror, the judge – and humans are not perfect. And a system that does not rely upon human beings would be one without sympathy and reasoned thought and would be imperfect as well. Our system strives to do what any good justice system should do:  it provides an opportunity for an accused to face his accusers and the evidence against him without a pre-determined outcome.

We trust our justice system every day to determine whether a presumably innocent person has violated the law such that he should be permanently deprived of his civil rights, freedom and even his life.What has some people upset about the civilian trial of KSM, from what I can tell, is that there is NOT a pre-determined outcome. It seems people are only willing to allow “justice” in this case if it’s no justice at all.

Look, I hate the terrorists as much as anybody else. I am a New Yorker. I ran from the crumbling towers that day. I felt the pain of the victims and their families. I want the people responsible to pay for their crimes. BIG TIME. I want it to hurt, slowly and for a long time. But I do not want our country to spiral into one that throws justice to the wayside when there is an iota of a chance that it will not turn out the way we want; when it might show that what we thought to be true, was not so. That kind of blind confidence in the “truth” and what is “right”  — to hell with justice — is what led to the Salem witch trials, Japanese-American internment camps and McCarthyism. Those are shameful times in American history and that is not an America we should beckon back. If we are willing to sacrifice justice, which has long been heralded as a core value of American society, why fight terrorism at all? They will have already won “death to America.”

Creative Commons License
The Justice For All by MushBrain, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Terms and conditions beyond the scope of this license may be available at mushbrain.net.
2 Responses Post a comment
  1. Joan permalink
    November 19, 2009

    great comments! It seems to me that the people who are the most opposed to seeing this trial in NY are the ones that used fear to rile people up for years. What are they afraid of now? New York did fine in prosecuting the blind shiek for the first World Trade Center bombing. And Guiliani – as mayor then – approved of that trial and was sure justice would be carried out. Justice triumphed then and it will now as well. Today he rots in jail alone- not a martyr, not a hero.

  2. MushBrain permalink*
    November 20, 2009

    I agree. The Daily Show did a great segment on Guiliani’s flip-flopping on this issue: http://gawker.com/5406279/rudy-guiliani-argues-with-himself-on-the-daily-show

Leave a Reply

Note: You may use basic HTML in your comments. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS